About Films

Satya Prakash's POV

Protest of the film "PADMAVATI" means victory of BJP in Gujarat 

The release date of the film 'Padmavati' is posponed but Godi media and saffron outfits are contnuously opposing the film as if the pride and glory of Rajputana and Hindutva are in the state of rupture to the level of notoriety.

1. If the pride and glory of Hindutva is Jauhar, it is very much in the film. The mass imolation of woman in order to avoid the capture by enemy troops of victor is called Jauhar.
2. The dance and song of queen Padmavati is pride and glory of Rajsthan. The picturization of Padmavati in dance sequence is so awesome and pious that is not derogatory.
3.The dream sequence of love scene between Delhi Sultanute and Queen Padmavat is cultivated rumour. It is not the part of the film.
4. The film 'Padmavati'is based upon the fictional manifestation of a poet Jayasi. The book is Padmavat and it is written in Awadhi.In order to polarize the Hindu votes against Muslims, the protest of the film has become mandatory.
5. BJP does not take care of the investment,creative writing , direction and production..They are useless in front of caste pride. 

6. BJP and its Hindu vigilante groups go to extent of lynching the people to polarize the votes. So victory may occur at the cost of human life.
7. Art ,literature, Painting, Sculpture and Film are the soft target for politicians to arouse and whip up the sentiment of people to vandalize the creation.
8. The senior journalist Dr.Ved Pratap Vaidik does not find any piece of abuse to queen Padmini, pride and glory of Rajputana.

The protest of the Film 'PADMAVATI' is the victory of BJP in Gujarat. If it happens so , BJP will fund to its Film makers to make such films neaer to election for polarizing votes.

About Films


Satya Prakash's POV

Political brouhaha against the film "Padmavati"is regression of society.

Film 'PADMAVATI' praises and recites pride and valor of Jauhar and Rajputana of Chittorgarh.
Senior journalist and pro BJP intellectual Ved Pratap Vaidik watched the movie and mentioned to the media , not a single scene goes against the pride and valor of Rajputana.Instead ,the film takes the pride to the maximum height of regality.

This is revival of Rajputanism and other castes. Is this Hindu Dharm ? It is fruitful ground for other casteist leaders to polarize their votes against BJP as well.

The upsurge of Rajpoot community will give the way for  upsurges of various  castes that are deterimental to the development of Indian society as a whole.As a result, art, literature,Cinema will also falter.

Period of PM Modi would be authored as Regression period of country.

About Films


Satya Prakash's POV



सिंधिया -थरूर, कांग्रेस-भाजपा और इतिहास-कला

शशि थरूर को फिर से इतिहास पढ़ने को कांग्रेस नेता ज्योतिर्दित्य सिंधिया ने कहा है ! सिंधिया को अपने अतीत राजतन्त्र और उसकी क्रूरता पर अभिमान है ! राजतन्त्र में भी हरम होते थे सिर्फ मुगलों, नबावों के यहाँ ही हरम होते थे , ऐसा नहीं है ! जब एक रजवाड़े का दूसरे रजवाड़े से युद्ध होता था तो विजेता की पैनी निगाह हरम पर ही होती थी क्योंकि औरत राजतन्त्र में पटरानी,रानियों का ज़रूर दर्ज़ा प्राप्त कर लेती थी लेकिन इनकी संख्या सैकड़ो और हज़ारों में होती थी ! राजतन्त्र का विरोध इसीलिए होना चाहिए की औरत गुलामों की ज़िन्दगी गुजरने के लिए अभिशप्त थी लेकिन प्रजाओं के लिए वो महारानी , रानी होती थी और राजा औरत के लिए युद्ध भी करते थे ! हरम में औरत राजाओं के काम-पिपासा के लिए थी लेकिन युद्ध में हारने के बाद ये जौहर कराती थी ! रानी पद्मावती ने भी १२००० औरतों के साथ अग्नि-कुंड में कूद गयी थी ! सती-प्रथा में जैसे पत्नी को मृतक पति के साथ जलना पड़ता था ! औरत सिर्फ पुरुष की भोग्या है ! पुरुष ख़त्म तो उसकी पत्नी को जौहर करा दो , सती बना दो या विधवा बनाकर सारे जीवन वीतरागी बना कर रखो ! कांग्रेस नेता ज्योतिर्दित्य सिंधिया को इतिहास की इस क्रूरता पर गौरव है तो वो अभी तक राजत्व के अवशेष बाहर निकल नहीं पाए हैं ! उन्हें पता नहीं की ये लोकतंत्र है , देश में एक संविधान है ! फिर तो उन्हें अपनी दादी राजमाता सिंधिया और बया मुख्यमंत्री राजे सिंधिया की तरह भाजपा में होना चाहिए ! यूँ भी को ठिकाना नहीं ! दोनों के बीच आदान-प्रदान होते रहते हैं !

इतिहास की इस घटना पर सिंधिया जी का क्या विचार हो सकता है?
संयोगिता और पृथ्वीराज चौहान की प्रेम गाथा के पीछे युद्ध और षड्यंत्र का इतिहास भी है ! कन्नौज के राजा जयचंद्र की सुपुत्री संयोगिता , मोहम्मद गोरी और पृथिवीराज चौहान की कहानी पर करनी सेना और सिंधिया को क्रोध क्यों नहीं आता ? राजा जयचंद संयोगिता और पृथ्वीराज चौहान की शादी न हो ,१७ बार युद्ध हुआ था ! जयचंद ने मोहम्मद गोरी को आमंत्रित किया था ! इसमें जाति मत तलाश कीजिये , इसे सिर्फ प्रेम के लिए युद्ध मानिये ! व्यक्तिरूप से मैं प्रेम को जाति और धर्म के पूर्वाग्रहों से ऊपर मानता हूँ और प्रेम इसीलिए किसी को किसी से हो सकता है ! प्रेम में युद्ध राजतन्त्र में होता था ! लोकतंत्र में प्रेम करने की आज़ादी है लेकिन लोकतंत्र ने अब ऐसा रूप ले लिया है कि ध्रुवीकरण हो जाता है और चुनाव में जीत का रास्ता आसान हो जाता है ! इसीलिए अंतर्जातीय और अंतर-धार्मिक शादियों पर आज राजनीती होती है और लव-जिहाद, घर-वापसी जैसे धार्मिक-अवधारणाओं की रचना हुयी है ! सिंधिया ऐसी ही राजनीती का समर्थन करते दीख रहे हैं और इसीलिए पद्मावती फिल्म के बहाने अपनी ही पार्टी के शिक्षित और विद्वान नेता शशि थरूर पर हमला कर बैठते हैं क्योंकि उनके पक्ष में एक खास जाति का ध्रुवीकरण मध्यप्रदेश के चुनाव में हो सके !कांग्रेस पार्टी पर इसीलिए अब लोगों का विश्वास काम हुआ है ! उत्तर भारत में कांग्रेस अगर उभर कर आएगी भी तो सिर्फ भाजपा के असफल होने से ! मध्यप्रदेश . छत्तीसगढ़ और हरियाणा में कांग्रेस की लौटने की संभावना बनी है लेकिन सिंधिया जैसे नेताओं की वजह से समीकरण बिगड़ भी सकते हैं ! ५-६ प्रतिशत वोट के चक्कर में विशाल जनता का समर्थन खो सकते हैं ! मेरे गावं में इस फिल्म को लेकर बहस चली और बहुसंख्यक ग्रामीण फिल्म के रिलीज़ होने के पक्ष में हैं ! जो जाति इस फिल्म का विरोध कर रही है,उसमें अधिकांश लोगों ने करनी सेना के उबाल के पीछे राजनीति और साज़िश बताया !
कुछ दिन पहले फिल्म " इंदू सरकार" का विरोध कांग्रेस पार्टी कर रही थी ! फिल्म को जब सेंसर बोर्ड ने सर्टिफिकेट दे दिया तो उसे रिलीज़ होने दीजिये ! विरोध के बावजूद रिलीज़ हुयी लेकिन क्या कांग्रेस की सरकार होती तो ये रिलीज़ हो पाती ? बिलकुल नहीं ! क्योंकि इन्होने पहले भी फिल्म " किस्सा कुर्सी का" और "आंधी " जैसी फिल्म को प्रदर्शित नहीं होने दिया था ! कोई भी पार्टी क्यों नहीं अपनी गलतियों के इतिहास से सबक लेती है ! फिल्म आइना है, आप खुलकर और ठन्डे मन से ज़रूर देखना चाहिए ताकि उन ग़लतिओं से सबक ले सके ! अगर फिल्म अच्छी नहीं है तो उस पर आलेख लिखें, सेमीनार आयोजित करें और बहस करें ! कांग्रेस और भाजपा को बहस से डर रहता है क्योंकि इनके अंदर लोकतंत्र का अभाव है! इसीलिए विरोध और मतभेद को बर्दाश्त नहीं कर पाते ! भाजपा और इसके समर्थन करनेवाले बहुत सारे हिंदूवादी संगठनों में धैर्य तो बिलकुल नहीं है ! भाजपा फिल्म का समर्थन कर रही है लेकिन उनके नेता और मंत्री नहीं ! गुजरात में भाजपा फिल्म पद्मावती के विरोध में है ! उत्तरप्रदेश में मंत्री चेतन चौहान विरोध में खड़े हैं !
हॉलीवुड और जर्मनी में हिटलर के पक्ष-विपक्ष में फिल्म बनी है लेकिन कोई तोड़-फोड़ नहीं क्योंकि वहां वंश की राजनीति ख़त्म हो चुकी है ! कला, साहित्य और सिनेमा का विरोध यूरोप और देश के दूसरे हिस्सों में सेमिनार में बहस के ज़रिये होते हैं !
दुनिया का सारा इतिहास द्वंद्वात्मक और वर्ग की अवधारणा पर आधारित होती है ! राजा का वंश ही राज्य करता था न की उनकी जाति के लोग ! उनकी जाति के लोग भी आम प्रजा या रियाया की तरह ही राजा, रानी, राजकुमार और राजकुमारी को कोर्निश करते होंगे ! उनकी जाति के लोग भी गरीब होते होंगे ! उनकी जाति के लोगों के घरों से भी खूबसूरत लड़किओं को राजा अपनी बहुत साड़ी रानिओं में शामिल करते होंगे क्योंकि वो राजा था क्योंकि उसे इश्वर ने राजा बनाया है ! लेकिन ऐसा नहीं है ! नहीं तो युद्ध कभी नहीं होते !
इसीलिए फिल्म " पद्मवती " का विरोध करनेवाले राजपूत करनी सेना अपने समुदाय के लोगों को जाति -विशेष के नाम पर जो हिंसक बना रहे हैं , उन्हें विवेक रहित कर रहे हैं , उन्हें वोट बैंक बना रहे हैं ! लोकतंत्र को कमज़ोर कर रहे हैं और यही काम कांग्रेस नेता ज्योतिर्दित्य सिंधिया कर रहे हैं !
कला, साहित्य और सिनेमा को रौंदकर प्रधानमंत्री मोदी जी भी देश का सर्वांगीण विकास नहीं कर सकते हैं और साढ़े तीन साल में इन्होने तय कर लिया है कि हमारा विकास गायगोबर, जुमला है ! कांग्रेस की वापसी की संभावना बन तो रही है लेकिन जो भाजपा कर रही है ,कांग्रेस भी वही करेगी तो फिर भाजपा के लिए रास्ता आसान बनेगा ! फिल्म -निर्देशक संजय लीला भंसाली और फिल्म-नायिका दीपिका पादुकोण के सर काटने वाले को करोडो रुपये इनाम देने वालों के साथ अगर कांग्रेस के नेता खड़े दिखेंगे तो कांग्रेस-भाजपाका फ़र्क़ तो ख़त्म ही समझो !
फिल्म " पद्मावती" का रिलीज़ डेट बढ़ गया है , शायद गुजरात चुनाव के बाद होंगे ! अब तो गली-गलौज और तोड़-फोड़ बंद करो मेरे वीरगाथा के रसगंगा में बहनेवालों शूरवीरों !

About Films

Satya Prakash's POV




मनु से फिल्म " पद्मावती" पर बातचीत 

अभी अभी १७ साल के मनु से बातचीत हुयी ! ग्वालियर का लड़का है ,छात्र है और संजय लीला भंसाली की फिल्म " पद्मावती" के विरोध में वव्हात्सप्प परमेस्सगे भेजा ! बेरोज़गार ग्रुप में मुझे भी डाल दिया है, सच भी है फ्री लांसर तो बेरोज़गार ही होते हैं ! खैर मनु के पोस्ट पर मैंने टिप्पणी कर दी कि पहले फिल्म देखिये ! विरोध का तोड़-फोड़ का रास्ता गलत है ! उसने मेरा नाम पूछा, बता दिया ! मैं इस उम्र के बच्चे का आक्रोश सुनना चाह रहा था !मनु बहुत ही शालीन मिजाज़ का लगा ! उसकी बातों में गुस्सा था ! बहुत सारी बातों को लेकर वो भ्रम में रहा ! जैसे उसने कहा कि रणवीर सिंह और दीपिका पादुकोण के बीच हॉट सन है ! इस फिल्म में तो कतई नहीं है ! अभिनेता रणवीर सिंह ने दीपिकाके साथ हाल में दो-तीन फिल्में कि है जो उनदोनों के बीच के प्रेम-प्रसंग को लेकर रणवीर ने मस्ती में कुछ कह दिया जो सोशल मीडिया पर वायरल हो गया ! दोनों का हॉट सीन फिल्म गोलियों की रासलीला : रामलीला और " बाजीराव मस्तानी" में है ! रणवीर और दीपिका के उस हॉट सीन की बातचीत को संजय लीला भन्साली की पद्मावती" से जोड़ दिया गया है ! इस फिल्म में श्रीलंका की राजकुमारी पद्मावती और चित्तौरगढ़ के राजा रत्नसेन के बीच का प्रेम का चित्रण स्वाभाविक है ! राजा रत्नसेन की भूमिका शाहिद कपूर ने की है ! यहाँ भ्रम उत्पन्न होता है !

फिल्म "पद्मावती" सिर्फ रानी पद्मावती की कहानी है ,उनकी प्रतिष्ठा, उनके राज्य कुल की सारी गरिमा को निर्देशक भंसाली ने फिल्म में बहुत अच्छी तरह से छायांकन किया है ! फिल्म का उच्च-स्तरीय निर्माण चित्तौड़गढ़ के राजमहलों और पोशाकों पर शोधपरक ध्यान रखा गया है ! गहने, जेवरात, झूमर और महलों की दीवारों पर रंग-रोगन और उत्कीर्ण तस्वीरें, संकेत और रात्रिकालीन रौशन की भव्यता का खयाल रखा गया है ! एक-एक चरित्र को ऐतिहासिक परिवेश के इंसानों में पैबस्त करने के लिए निर्देशक भंसाली ने दी-रात एक कर दिया तब जाकर ये फिल्म बनी है ! ये फिल्म मूलतः रानी पद्मावती के इर्द-गिर्द घूमती है ! 
मनु ने सवाल उठाया कि इसमें अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को बड़ा किरदार दिया गया है ! ये भी भ्रम पैदा करता है ! फिल्म " पद्मावती" के तीन मज़बूत किरदार हैं : राजा रत्नसेन ,पद्मावती और अलाउद्दीन खिलजी ! अलाउद्दीन खिलजी इस फिल्म में खलनायक है , नकारात्मक भूमिका में है , विध्वंसक है , रानी पद्मावती कि सुंदरता पर पागल, दीवाना और वहशी था ! दिल्ली सल्तनत ही उसकी ताकत थी और देश के रजवाड़े के साथ उनकी अपनी शर्तों पर दोस्ती थी ! हर राजा अपनी सत्ता के प्रसार के लिएकुछ भी करता है ..मतलब युद्ध की सीमा तक जाताहै और दोनों तरफ से लोगों की हत्या होती है ! अब राजतन्त्र नहीं है तो उसकी फिल्म देखते हैं ! देश में लोकतंत्र है , इसीलिए हम फिल्म बनाते हैं और उसका विरोध भी करते हैं ! "पद्मवती" दो राजाओ के बीच की कहानी है , दो राजतंत्रों की कहानी ! दो राजतन्त्रोंके मर्यादा और पौरुष की चलगाथा है ! रानी "पद्मावती" राजा रत्नसेन की अन्य रानियों के साथ जौहर करती है ! तटस्थ होकर इतिहास को देखना चाहिए और फिर उसकी आलोचना और समालोचना होना चाहिए ! तोड़-फोड़ , अराजकता है ! 
मनु को मैने कहा कि इस फिल्म का नायक-नायिका रत्नसेन और पद्मावती है ! प्रबंध-काव्य "पद्मावत" में राजा रत्नसेन की पहली पत्नी --पटरानी रानी नागमती थी जिसकी विरह-वेदना की मार्मिकता को कविता के काव्य के रचना-विधान में कवि मालिक मोहम्मद जायसी ने बखूबी पिरोया है !

मनु अलाउद्दीन खिल जी के खलनायक होने पर शांत हुए ! आवाज़ में गंभीरता आ गयी थी ! कहा अगर आपने जैसी फिल्म की चर्चा की हैतो फिर विरोध तो नहीं बनता है लेकिन लोग तैयार है कि इसे सिनेमा हॉल में लगने नहीं देंगे.
मैंने कहा कि मनु , अब आप लोगों को समझा सकते हैं !
इस फिल्म को लेकर करनी सेना और कुछ दक्षिणपंथी राजनीतिज्ञों ने अपना हाथ खूब सेंका है !
कला , साहित्य और सिनेमा किसी भी देश का गौरव होते हैं लेकिन हिन्दुस्तान में अब ये उपद्रवी तत्वों के शिकार हो रहे हैं !
मेरे फिल्म के दोस्तों से कहना है कि जब आपलोग मुझे कहते हो , आप फिल्म से ज़्यादा राजनीति पर पोस्ट लिखते हो ! देखो ,आपकी फिल्मों का क्या हाल हो रहा है ? देखा आपने कैसे निर्देशक संजय लीला भंसाली को जयपुर में पीटा और उनके दूसरे सेट महाराष्ट्र में सेट में आग लगा दी ! फिल्म को , आप अपने को देश की राजनीति से अलग नहीं देख सकते ! इसीलिए आप भी आईये और कम से कम अपनी फिल्म ही बचा लीजिये !
मैंने मनु से कम से कम बात तो की !

About Films

Satya Prakash's POV

Protest against violent & distorted protest against film” PADMAVATI”

The protest of the film “PADMAVATI” is bulldozing tower of art and aesthetic as tower of educational centres like JNU,HU,ALLAHABAD UNIVERSITY, BHU were attacked to make the students parrot but establishment failed. The films are being stalled with fierce for various periods of various governments. However, the protest is now designed furiously attacking. In Kota, the activists of Rajput Karni Sena had taken law and order in their hands and vandalized the “Aakash Theatre” because it had screened trailer of film “Padmavati” on the eve of “CHILDREN’S DAY”. This is an anti-national act of the group of certain castes of Rajsthan, vehemently supported by ruling establishment in states and centre in order to polarize votes of certain castes whose sentiment is hurt because of the film “Padmavati” that has exposed the queen PADMAVATI of Chittorgarh. 

The film Maker Sanjay Leela Bhansali has convinced the wounded community in many times that all the respects and reputations of legendary queen “Padmavati “ has been kept intact in the film and maintained the grandeur glory and prosperity of kingdom of Rajputana of Chittorgarh. Surprisingly, a new industry has been set up in lieu of industry for jobs in this country. That is called”Industry of Hurt Sentiment” that is actively volatile. The chemical reaction is so bombarding that it cannot be prevented in the test tube or the laboratory. It blows out beyond the wall to react to the body and respect of great film maker like “Sanjay Leela Bhansali” and his film “Padmavati”. Few days before, a Tamil film had hurt the people of ruling class of this country because it has questioned the “PERCENTAGE OF GST “. But see dear friends, the move of Government on GST is 180 degree because of mounting pressure of business community and people. Now it is now adjusted. So mistakes after mistakes, lies after lies, attacks after attacks ruling establishment inflict upon the people and opposition but it comes to normal by taking protest injection.Bhansali’s film has always been aesthetic and entertaining in a dignified ways. His previous film “ BAJIRAO MASTANI” had also received wrath protest from Maratha community for banning the film in 2015 but film was released and people appreciated and loved to see it. The Marathi people particularly entered the theatres from Mumbai to small town.
The Censor Board of Film Certification has given its approval. Prasoon Joshi is sensitive and creative person, positioned by ruling establishment. Then why do MLA, leaders and activists support the Karni Sena that had attacked and bashed up Sanjay Leela Bhansali in Jaipur and vandalised his set in Maharashtra ? This is the tacit agreement between these two organizations. Police is lukewarm towards such vandalized action of Sena. Above all, Supreme Court had snubbed that it would not intervene in sordid affair of banning the film “Padmavati”.
Ruling class of the country is shaking hand with casteist Karni Sena that has not so far watched the movie despite Bhansali’s repeated invitation. So this is hatched conspiracy against art and aesthetic world we have seen in case of Dalit-writer Kancha Ellaihiya who was attacked for release of his recent book. Few right wing Hindu outfits had killed writers and social workers like Dr.Dhabolkar, Comrade Pansare,Prof.Kulburgi and journalist Gauri Lankesh to shut the mouth against right wing injustice.
Bhansali’s each film is the moving showcase of historical facts aesthetically. His film fetches heavy investment like more than Rs.100 crores. How can he puts controversial elements in the film for invitinting wrath and hostility of community. The vandalism and brouhaha are negative for the investment in the film.He makes film to mint money. He cannot dare to distort the fact. He has consulted the Historians and the epic poetry of Mohmmad Jayasi who had penned this fictional love story in the poetry forms in “PADMAVAT” in Awadhi language and that’s why, it is still popular in the cauldron of human beings. As Tulsidas had jotted down the epic poetry “RAMCHARIT MANAS”in Awadhi”.
However, audiences will pour at theatres to see the movie “Padmavati” and the cine-lovers and writers-directors, actors and all cine-tech persons of Indian Cinema must stand up to support for the successful release of the film.
I wish Mr.Bhansali for grand success of his film “Padmavati”

About Films

Satya Prakash's POV

Baba Ram Rahim has written autobiographical script.

Political film is being set in Haryana with tight security of Paramilitary and Flag March of Army in the cities of Panchkula and Rohtak.The makeshift court is being constructed for court drama in the Rohtak Jail.The judges will land from the Helicopter with fortified security because the devotees of Ram Rahim has demonstrated their muscle power against state two days before in Haryana and Punjab by damaging the public and private property, assaulting upon the Police and common people. Around 38 People lost their lives to protect their Godman.Entire country is stunned to the strength of Hero Gurmeet Ram Rahim who had headed more than 35 departments of Film "MSG: The Warrior lion Heart".He is hero, director, Story-writer,Music Director, Costume Director and above all he is the producer too for the films.In Bollywood, if someone manages investment in making the films, he does not listen to others and he delivers all crafts of cinema whether or not he is aware of the technology of making the film. Saint Gurmeet is having plenty of money,can be sensed through the violence designed by him or his followers who had gone against the integrity of the country by chanting anti-national slogans.

 

Therefore,the making of the film is being shot by the various TV channels through various camera angle.Real film will begin at 2.30 pm in court that is the last scene of the film. The climax may create violence so that the Army is marching on the roads of Haryana, raising the flag and cautioning the self-proclaimed protector of Reilgion.However, the disciples of Godman Ram Rahim can not be mum over the final hearing of punishment.

 

The POV may be different but the judges have shown their commitment to restore the values of Law Book of country.The POV is point of view, Subjective Camera Angle and Objective Camera Angles altogether make the film.Here the anchor of various Satellite TV channels will becoming to the people of India through Subjective Camera Angle but the film will have all the camera angles. Baba Ram Rahim must have been familiar with these angles because he has directed the films.

Our judges will render the strict punishment so that other such so called religious ,hypocrite and jingoist saint will take lesson to disturb the integrity of the country. Court will go through the pathological treatment of such anti-national. 

 

Please be careful to see the film even at your Home TV Set.They have AK 47 and other high-tech arsenals confiscated from his Religious Ashram.Such an anti national vandalism, intimidation and murder must be amounted as Anti-National activity.

 

After climax of the film, the film would be action-oriented with perverted romance.Baba Ram Rahim can produce a film by financing his subordinate saint who will act as Ram Rahim,will be patronized by the government.

Religion is much more powerful than state ?

About Films

Satya Prakash's POV

Religion is much more powerful than state ?

Violence erupted in Punjab and Haryana when Baba Gurmeet Ram Rahim of Suchcha Dera was convicted in rape case has inspired me to write in two reasons:

First it's obvious by inclination of writing interest on social-political upheaval and second the saint has produced few of the films by becoming hero in those films.The political system is recessive and religious system is dominant. Or there may be tacit relation between Religion and politics.

Religion is much more powerful than state .One can see it in Haryana and Punjab.The army and more than 15000 para-military forces deployed, all modern high-tech communications blocked did not prevent religious vigilantes religious fanatics from damaging private and public property in bigger proportion and didn't save the people's lives. How can a rapist be  the master of knowledge to redeem the sufferings of the people ?

Religion can not be synonymous to the Development.How can the bloody and ferocious lumpenism of these followers of saint turned hero Gurmeet Singh and lynching activities of Cow-vigilantes convince me and other rational people that Religion is non-violent.

How can government fail to control them despite so many security precautions, surfaces doubts. The Home Minister Rajnath Singh was in touch with administration and other from foreign land but violence happened in its gruesome manner.

In Punjab,two Railway stations were damaged.Today, Haryana Roadways are looking a clean black serpentine road. Religion is like venom of snake only.

Another saint Rampal's verdict is also about to come in next week.Goverment must take precaution to look after the people of the state.

Religion is much more powerful than state we have seen in Mosque demolition in Ayodhya and now here in Haryana and Punjab.The people lose their thinking capacity as we have seen the few fanatics who go against a fourteen years old boy who had written something wrong about incarnated persona of a religion. So much brouhaha of hostility was aired !!!!!!

People died do not matter, religion matters because it wins to kill the people by intimidating the people and state power.

We are shooting here. Few of the people have forbade us from coming for shoot.The precarious position can be registered on the long and lonely road.Fear has gripped the ambience around human settlements and on the road that has brunt cars, vehicles.As if it is a bloody violent action scene of a film shooting.Very horrendous scene !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This violent action has a pathetic story as well as a grotesque romantic story of a Saint Gurmeet Ram Raheem Singh of Dera Suchha. The baba has been producers of two-three films and he became hero of the films "MSG", MSG 2" and other films.The saint has been glamour-loving world and that's why, he has made film by becoming protagonist who has created a magical karishma of being  incarnation of God who conveys the message of God. The film has high-tech use of VFX to enlarge the Baba Ram Rahim.He stir ripple in water of Bollywood but he is fanatic in creation also. He is self-centric and so he used to guide and control directer too. He had invested  seventy million Indian currency for his films. Other than this, he spent many millions Indian currency on Publicity and Release.Film got its money back along with Benefit .Ram Rahim has 100 million followers in the country but much more in Haryana and Punjab.

Our hero is in Police custody. However, he has shaken the political  power of Punjab and Haryana.One of saint who is Member of Parliament,has opposed the judgement of the court.It shows that Baba Gurmeet Ram Rahim has great influence upon the present political combination of ruling class of India.

The film maker must come forward to make a fabulous film on such a brave saint whose arrest has ruptured the law and order system of two states and more than 30 people lost their lives.

I am not shooting today. I am here only.

About FilmsSatya Prakash's POV

Film or any art form liberates the human world critically.

As a film maker and liberal person believing in universalization cannot go with opposition or ban of the film”INDU SARKAR” directed by Madhur Bhandarkar. Madhur keeps making a film based upon reality that prevails in our society. I am in support of “No Ban” to any art form of the world. The CBFC headed by Pehlaj Nihalani has been in controversy and brouhaha since he has been heading it for the matter of puritan form of art. Mr.Pahlani had gone against the film “ Lipstick Under My Burkha” produced by Prakash Jha who won the case in court and got the green flag of release. How can Pehlaj Nihalani be away from his own films that have obscene and kissing scenes in swimming pool. He had answered that after enthroning the post of chairperson of CBFC he chopped off the scenes after thirty years of their releases, makes me a great deal of laugh.

I and other arty persons must support the film makers for their creations. CBFC has to give the certification of the film like “A”, “U” “A/U” only with few advice.
Film must pick up the subjects from history and contemporary world. After the advent of Modi Government, Emergency has been the subject that has emotionalized the mass whilePM Modi begins to deliver his extempore speech on the brutality of system that had cropped up by Congress Government .Madhur himself has told that his film “INDU SARKAR” is influenced by the historical actuality of involving men and incidents that make the history of significance of emergency and seventy percent of the events in the film, has share of imagination and fiction. 

The film has great depiction of Sanjay Gandhi, the younger son of PM Indira Gandhi and husband of Cabinet Minister Maneka Gandhi and father of BJP MP Varun Gandhi but neither Maneka Gandhi nor Varun Gandhi had gone against the film. Either they sense it right publication on celluloid or they are afraid of raising a single question on this film.The fear not only mounts the pressure upon the corrupt politicians and creative middle class persons but also many who are inside the government at higher post.They have fear of losing the status whatever they have...
I admire Film Maker Prakash Jha who had gone to the court in support of his film " Lipstick under My Burqa" and he fought against previous CBFC constituted by UPA government for his film "CHAKRVYUH" for a song that contains the Ambani. The song was popular.
The film “UDTA PUNJAB” received monumental block from CBFC led by Pehlaj Nihalani but surprisingly this film does not paint the state Punjab in bad light. Mr.Pehlaj must be critical of his previous ban on few films that do not gather a single logic of cut and ban the film. So the banning the film itself is like an emergency imposed by chairperson Mr.Nihalani on Film Industry that is reduced in fear.
The congress party must learn about power of censor when it was reigning India uninterrupted , it had banned classic movie of the world “ AANDHI”. Congress Party has committed mistake in past by banning book, painting and sculpture and film. So the BJP has adopted the same weapon to attack on the films of other film makers and permits such films to release that help it ideologically.
I support the release of the film “ INDU SARKAR” .

About Films 
Satya Prakash's POV

"Thinking of Him" ::- First Romantic Film of a Nobel laureate in the world.

Our International Film “Thinking of Him” has entered in the phase of Post-production in the studio of Buenos Aires, the capital of Argentina. The film maker Pablo Cesar and other post-production professionals have been working on it to make the world’s fabulous, touchy and catchy love -story of Nobel Laureate “RabindranathTagore” and Argentinian famous authoress “Victoria Ocampo” being co-produced by Johnson-Suraj Films International, India and Cesar Films, Argentina.
Cine-professionals like editor, sound-designer, Back ground scorer and others are deeply involved to pay their best to make a wonderful film for the audiences of world.

“One Scene, One shot" cinematography treatment is the feature of this film. Another technical feature is sync sound.

The film “Thinking of Him” has 69 scenes that means the film must have 69 shots. However, the film has three scenes that have got use of elephant as living props in the jungle of Shantiniketan, Bolpur but on that very day, scenes did not have elephant available on the shooting locations and so three scenes got six shots and take one and take two. One scene has got a child hallucination that got also one extra shots. So film completes with 69 scenes and 73 shots.

When camera starts rolling till the director’s call of cut, is known as one shot. One take is a long take that lasts much longer than the traditional editing run. One take’s durability may be very long or may be the time-length of the film that fades out just before screening of credit roll. So in this regard, the film “Thinking of Him” has a piquant technical that is available in rare films.

Such a long take of a scene moves on dolly panther with long straight or circular trolley track with few persons assisting “Directorate of Photography”. "One scene, One Shot” seeks many rehearsal with the characters. The "Long Take" of a shot makes many compositions ranging from long size to mid to close-up to two to master size vice versa. Therefore, marking of positions of characters and their movements must gel with the pace of Dolly Panther.

The film “Thinking of Him” goes ahead from fade-in to fade-out with love of real persona like Rabindranath Tagore and Victoria Ocampo in real time and that’s why, “Black and White” tone of the film aestheticizes Tagore-Victoria’s era from India to Argentina to India to Paris.

This moving real happenings of the lives of protagonists of 1920’s, have been fiction zed in real locations. The real persona like GURUDEV or Rabindranath Tagore played by India’s great actor Victor Bannerjee who is not only looking like Tagore but he also adopts his body- language. Another real character is Victoria Ocampo played by Argentinean famous actress “Eleonora Wexler” who is not only so proximate to the persona of Victoria Ocampo but she is seemingly love of Tagore.

The film “ Thinking of Him” has been shot on romancing camera of Arriflex435 in the era of digital wave where a series of camera of 4k resolutions are available and they are being used to shoot but the Arriflex 435 has wheel of black and white reel as well as coloured reel too. So the entire team of both production houses had so been amused, thrilled during shooting from India to Argentina to France that was beyond the description of words. Arriflex 435 is a sort of romance of director, cinematographer, producers, other technicians and actors too.

The present time of the film goes ahead with fictional characters who keep moving in Shantiniketan, Bolpur that is two hours away from fast train voyage, Bolpur market, forests. This part of the film establishes a coherent philosophy of education designed by Nobel Laureate Tagore with the help of an young American fellow Leonard Elmhurst who is agriculturist too.

The present day spreads in a long span of time with many characters like 70 years old man Prakash, 13-15 years old Amaya, few students( boys and girls) and many fictional characters including young Kamali played by Raima Sen who has profoundly delivered her acting. Her eyes and face have much potential emotions to a fictional young professor Felix played by Hector Bordoni who has come to Shantiniketan to get rid of his agony.

Protagonists characters acted by Victor Bannerjee, Eleonora Wexler, Raima Sen, Hector Bordoni, Professor Bratin Chatterjee, Somo Sarkar and many characters from India, Argentina and France have played their share of roles along with sync of technical team and production team.

Mr.Suraj Kumar, the co-producer of the film “THINKING OF HIM” is hilariously waiting for the first cut of the film from his counterpart co-producer Mr. Pablo Cesar.

The first cut of the film after post-production will go through the dubbing in Hindi and Bengali languages from English that is used in sync sound tech on the silent locations.

This is the first film on the love of a Nobel laureate in the world Cinema I feel raised to be part of this film.

                                                                                                        By:Satya Prakash

About Films

Satya Prakash's POV

Antariksh has  musical guitar session of around 5 minutes.I find his compete devotion into playing guitar so amazing that one can sense the virtue of strings he plays on.
Please listen. enjoy and encourage Antariksh.

About Films 

Satya Prakash's POV

Film “ Thinking of Him” :- Amazing for Actor Victor Banerjee
( More than ½ age difference)

Unveiling the curtain to say to you all about our great International Actor Victor Banerjee who has acted the role of Nobel Laureate world’s poet Rabindranath Tagore in our film “Thinking of Him”. What an awesome resemblance between two personas of Bengal.

!!!!!!!!!!! What a body gesture and the move of his step of Victor Banerjee as Tagore!!!! Resemblance and actions of actor will take you to the image of Tagore, the entire human world has perceived in their senses.

Another striking feature profoundly and coincidently has happened in the life of great actor Victor Banerjee, is so fascinating that you will be amazed. In our film “THINKING OF HIM” the story revolves around the platonic love between Tagore and Argentinian famous authoress Victoria Ocampo and their intellectual pursuit. Moot point is the age –difference between two giant international personality .Love does not take notice of ages and wrinkles on skin. Love needs human discourse between two individuals.

Victoria and Tagore love to each other at the Human discourse of purest form of Art and that is none other than the poetry. Such a ventilation of art between them is termed as Love. However, we cannot dub love between Tagore and Victoria as their lovey-dovey .Their symbiosis became the symbiosis of two nations: India and Argentina. The actor Victor Banerjee drowns himself into ocean and becomes so impersonal from himself and forms a grand character of Rabindranath Tagore of various ages when he keeps replying to the letters of Victoria Ocampo since 1913 when he receives world’s most coveted accolade Nobel Prize for his poetry “Gitanjali”. Tagore touches his 52 springs and Victoria Ocampo has got fabulous 23 springs.
Actor Tagore is now at 63 and Victoria at 34. They both interact at Buenos Aires of Argentina. Victoria is restless to feel weakness of her Gurudev. She takes him to her residence.


A new sublimated intellectual discourse begins between them, between reciting Tagore and Vijaya (Tagore lovingly calls Victoria as Vijaya) Where is Our great actor Victor Banerjee ? You will nowhere find him in this film “Thinking of Him”. This is the immense impersonalization of Victor Banerjee into the world figure Rabindranath Tagore.This is the great virtue of actor who maintains his entire Byranotic (The romantic poet Byran of England) passion and intellectual fascination to the great young lady Victoria Ocampo of Buenos Aires. Eleonora Wexler ,the great young actress of Buenos Aries is so marvel to ooze out her character. Awesome sync between two awesome actors of India and Argentina has added aesthetic to the visuals of the film. When Tagore comes back to India, he confesses that his writings have improved with divine human fascination.He has written a love song for Victoria Ocampo and that is on the lips of Bengali people cutting across the ages. Tagore has painted more than two thousand paintings on humble insistence of Victoria Ocampo. This is the love between them.


Love has freed Tagore and Victoria from all social complexes and they have reached a new height of world persona that has compelled all of us to make film on it. In 1930, the same age difference but they meet in Paris where Victoria Ocampo organizes Painting Exihibition at Pigalle Gallery,Paris, France.This is manifestation of love on the part of love lady of Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore. Victoria’s love lies in fascination to the sacrifice. Tagore’s attention is so hearty that storms in the ocean of paintings and poetry.

Same beautiful thing happened again in Cine-life of great actor Victor Banerjee in film “The Jogger’s Park” where he is a retired judge who starts loving a beautiful young girl acted by sultry beauty Perizad who comes in contact with Judge for legal assistance because she has some property legal case. Victor Banerjee as Judge has assisted her with full devotion of infatuated love. The young unmarried girl and the retired judge frees from this bonding to the human plank. However, this film is complete a fictional work so they both actors play the fictional characters.

Reverse to it, our film “Thinking of Him” is fictiono-realistic film. Tagore and Victoria ‘s portion is real and that’s why, this part of film has been shot on Black and white reel of Arri 435….The film maker’s vintage romance is emotionally related to it.



How history of great actor Victor Banerjee gets replicated again in our film “THINKING OF HIM” in long years of 2003, romanticize all of us who can love the woman of any age if we value the woman as human.

About Films


Satya Prakash's POV



Film " BAHUBALI" & "BAHUBALI 2"

फिल्म " बाहुबली"----एक जादुई दुनिया .

विजुअल इफ़ेक्ट और एनीमेशन देखना है तो फिल्म से रागात्मकता होगी वरना ये फिल्म ये फिल्म प्रकांतर से राजा-रानी के बच्चों के राजा बनने की पुरानी कहानी है ! रात में सोते समय दादी और नानी जो कहानी सुनाती थी, उसे ही विशेष दृश्यात्मक प्रभाव से हिंसा को और भी रक्तरंजित करके निर्देशक ने परोस दिया है ! बाहुबली का पहला भाग से ये बोध हुआ था और मैंने इस फिल्म के ज़रिये अपनी दादी,परदादी, नानी को याद कर लिया था ! वो राजा और उसके घर के साज़िश और युद्ध के ताने-बाने अपनी स्थानीय बोली के शौर्य में सुनाती थी ! हम सारे बच्चे सोते ही नहीं थे और उन्हें कहते थे ..और फिर...! परदादी फिर से शुरू होती थी और हमारी नींद को उडा देती थी ! फिल्म" बाहुबली" की चर्चा इसीलिए भी हो रही है कि इस फिल्म का कथानक के ऊपर फिल्म के शिल्प का और खासकर डिजिटल शिल्प का प्रभाव दर्शक को बेचैन कर देता है , ठीक उसीतरह से जैसे संयुक्त -परिवार के सभी बच्चे बरामदे में पडी बिस्तर पर परदादी से कहते थे कि भीष्म पितामह ने ऐसा क्यों किया ? कटप्पा ने बाहुबली को क्यों मारा था !

 फिल्म " बाहुबली" २ के पास दर्शकों की बेचैन करनेवाली और बेतहाशा दौड़ का कारण भी यही है ! ये भी है लेकिन इसे बताने में सिने-शिल्प का जो वितान गढ़ा गया है ,वो अनुपम ही नहीं , मनमोहक है बिलकुल किस्सागोई करती परदादी, दादी और नानी की तरह !

फिल्म के शिल्प में कथानक का लोप भी हो जाए तो दर्शक फिर भी धड़कते दिल से फिल्म को देखता रहता है!
फिल्म तकनीकी-कला है लेकिन फिल्म उत्तर-तकनीकी कला का उत्तरार्ध की कला है जिसमें डिजिटल वर्ल्ड के सभी रंगों में दर्शक रंग जाते हैं ! एक जादू की दुनिया !

About Films

Satya Prakash's POV

Interaction with a Film Maker 

Documentary Film Maker Mirza Shabnam is awesome human being and she came to Mumbai with her lovely son Anandiya who is an University student and has great love for music and guitar.The guy is superb youth.

Shabnam is working for a reputed TV news channel and she has directed and produced a number of  documentary films and she got award in India too like in Chennai and Patna.

We discussed oceanic amount of issues of Human world that is still in mess.The digital world is dominated by paid rumor-mongers that spread dangerous emotional message and concocted VFX across the world.

I and Shabnam both will start making documentary film on formation of India,Pakistan and Bangladesh.Subject is enthralling and scintillating. 

 Ajay Biswas is a fourth guy who is an actor and he lives in Mumbai with full of passionate zeal of acting.

The evening has been ventilation of full knowledge.   

About Films 

Satya Prakash's POV

नग्न-यथार्थवाद की क्रूरता में खूबसूरत उम्मीद का दास्तान---बेगम जान 

फिल्म " बेगम जान" भारत और पकिस्तान के रेडक्लिफ लाइन की  दिलचस्प दास्तान है ! निर्देशक सृजित मुखर्जी देश के बंटवारे को नहीं बल्कि दो देशो के मर्दवादी अफसरान जिस्म बेचनेवाली औरतों के घरों को ख़त्म करके, औरतों के वजूद को ख़त्म करके अंजाम देते हैं  ! खासकर ऐसी औरतें जो दोनों मुल्कों के सारे फरमानों को धता बताकर लड़ती है और अग्नि  से घिरे उस घर के दरवाजों के अंदर बंद कर जला कर खुद को ख़त्म कर देती है !
फिल्म के अंदर के कथानक मेलोड्रामा का  सहारा लेकर आगे बढ़ता जाता है ! फिल्म की  कहानी , घटनाएं इतनी वास्तविक होते हुए भी मेलोड्रामा से सराबोर हो उठती है ! शायद निर्देशक "बेगम जान" के कोठे के दर्द को रोमानियत  से रंग देना चाहते हैं ! कामयाब तो हुए हैं लेकिन कही-कही बोझिल भी दीखती है !

मशहूर अफसानानिगार इस्मत चुगताई और सआदत हसन मंटो की कुछ कहानियों को स्क्रीन प्ले में पिरोते हुए फिल्म को आरम्भ से अंत तक ले जाते हैं ! मंटो की एक दर्दनाक कहानी "खोल दो" के सकीना का किरदार शबनम में पैबस्त हो उठता है जो कोठे पर आने के पहले ही लूट ली गई है ! ये किरदार फिल्म में बहुत देर तक बर्फ की तरह सर्द पडी रहती है और कोठे को बचाने के सिलसिले में बूढ़े राजा के वहशीपन का शिकार बनती है!

जब दो मुल्क बन रहें हो और हवा में जमुहुरियत ( लोकतंत्र) की सायं -सायं आवाज़ें आ रही हो तो एक छोटे से ब्रॉथेल ( वैश्यालय) की समस्या का निदान दोनों मुल्को के अफसरान तो कर सकते थे ! 

फिल्म " बेगम जान" दोनों मुल्कों के रेडक्लिफ लकीर में गरीब. मज़लूम , बेबस औरतों की चीख को दफनाते हुए दिखती है कि दोनों आज़ाद मुल्क का आजतक के विस्तार में गरीब ,मज़दूर औरत रो-रो कर जी रहे हैं ! सरहद के दोनों तरफ इंसानों की हैसियत दबंग सरमायदारों के सामने कुछ भी नहीं है !

 फिल्म का क्लाइमेक्स में दोनों मुल्कों के अफसरानों और गुर्गे के साथ जिस वीरता के साथ ये जिस्म बेचनेवाली औरते  लड़ती है, ये आज के जड़त्व को प्राप्त होते हुए समाज में विद्रोह के आगाज़ होने की प्रेरणा भी दे जाता  है ! इसीलिए फिल्म के अंत में , आग की लपेट में गरीबों के घर जल रहे हैं , गरीब लड़ रहे हैं और शायर साहिर लुधियानवी के गीत बहुत कुछ कह जाते हैं --
 " वो सुबह तो कभी आएगी , वो सुबह तो कभी आएगी,
  इन काली सदियों के सर से, जब रात का आँचल ढलकेगा,
  जब दुःख के बदल पिघलेंगे,जब सुख का सागर छलकेगा,
  जब अम्बर झूम के नाचेगा,जब धरती नग्में गाएगी
   वो सुबह तो कभी आएगी !"
---------
----------------

  लेकिन दृश्य की भयानकता  ( घर के साथ ,औरत जल रही हैं) में  मेलोड्रामा क्रिएट कर साहिर का नगमा एक खूबसूरत दुनियां की तरफ इशारा करता है ! नग्न-यथार्थवाद की क्रूरता से खूबसूरत आशावाद पर आधारित फिल्म " बेगम जान " को एक बार तो ज़रूर देखिये !